[oe] meta-networking pending patches

[Martin Jansa]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:27:18PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> [Re: [oe] meta-networking pending patches] On 15.03.10 (Tue 13:44) MacDonald, Joe wrote:
> 
> > Sure thing. I'll have a look today and update the status appropriately.
> > 
> > -J.
> > 
> > On 10 Mar 2015 06:30, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> > 
> > can you please check pending meta-networking patches?
> > 
> > my master-next shows:
> > pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
> 
> This has already been merged (ab75a8c8d0a57411af1452f9f8f41ccf29bb0cc7)
> and I don't see it in my patchworks list now.  The filter I'm using is
> this:
> 
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?state=1&q=meta-networking&archive=both

OK, master-next version was adding it to recipes-daemons instead of
recipes-protocols, that's why it wasn't resolved when rebasing
master-next. Will drop it now from master-next.

Please use meta-networking bundle as filter as well:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Patchwork#Multiple_layers_sharing_the_same_oe_project_on_patchwork

> > pick 64461e1 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
> 
> I placed this one in 'rework' state on January 26th after requesting a
> clarification on the bash requirement and suggesting at least one of the
> patches be tweaked.
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/67476
> 
> I haven't seen a follow-up on it, but it looks like master-next has the
> v3 that I commented on.

OK

> > pick f5ba5af netkit-telnet: add new recipe
> 
> It looks like this was merged (56e58865851a3160c49d9929011a0eccc9b0c8e2)
> and I'm not seeing it in my filter.

again master-next version had it in different directory
recipes-daemons and merged version is recipes-netkit, will drop it from
master-next.

> > pick 1e6dd99 iscsi-initiator-utils: fix SELinux label for initiatorname.iscsi
> 
> This was dropped in favour of the version going to meta-selinux.  I
> updated patchworks to indicate it was being reworked a while back.

OK, dropping from master-next.

> > pick 8a09ac6 vlan: install vconfig into /sbin same as Ubuntu and Fedora.
> 
> I've merged this today.

thanks

> > pick 6fdadbe stunnel: Update to version 5.10
> 
> This got missed in my regular filter for obvious reasons.  I've merged
> it as well.

thanks

> > pick e74b325 postfix: add link file /usr/lib/sendmail
> > pick 64de50c wireshark: update to 12.4
> > pick 4428a44 crda: move libnl, libgcrypt to DEPENDS
> > pick 5cd9417 esmtp: update sendmail link files
> 
> These were already in my queue but I've dumped them in favour of the
> cherry-picks.

thanks

> > and few more are in patchwork:
> > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
> 
> The others in this list also look like they were missed because they
> didn't contain the meta-networking tag in the subject line.  Are you
> manually creating that bundle or do you just have better filtering
> technology than I do for catching these oddball ones?

I'm maintaining all bundles manually

First I add to bundles based on e-mail prefix, but then when I'm reading
the commits for cherry-picking them to master-next I sometimes notice
that the patch is touching some layer without saying so in subject
prefix and I add these oddball onces to separate bundle just before
cherry-pick.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/attachments/20150311/374a666b/attachment-0002.sig>