[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] plymouth: remove virtual prefix for RPROVIDES

[Paul Eggleton]

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:58:45 Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:30:52PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> > The 'virtual' namespace is only intended to be used for build-time
> > dependencies, not in the runtime package namespace.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald <joe_macdonald at mentor.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb
> > b/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb index de23dcd..597d8cd
> > 100644
> > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb
> > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb
> > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> > "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f"> 
> >  DEPENDS = "libcap libpng cairo dbus udev"
> >  PROVIDES = "virtual/psplash"
> > 
> > -RPROVIDES_${PN} = "virtual/psplash virtual/psplash-support"
> > +RPROVIDES_${PN} += "psplash psplash-support"
> 
> This causes new NOTE in every build:
> NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime psplash (psplash,
> plymouth) NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_RPROVIDER entry to match
> psplash
> 
> Do you want to update
> meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
> to resolve this first?

Is this even the right thing to do? Is plymouth a direct drop-in replacement 
for psplash as this implies or (as I suspect) are there subtle differences?

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre