[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] plymouth: remove virtual prefix for RPROVIDES

[Khem Raj]

Infact it is a direct replacement

On Jul 13, 2016 3:32 PM, "Paul Eggleton" <paul.eggleton at linux.intel.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:58:45 Martin Jansa wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 12:30:52PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> > > The 'virtual' namespace is only intended to be used for build-time
> > > dependencies, not in the runtime package namespace.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe MacDonald <joe_macdonald at mentor.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb
> > > b/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb index
> de23dcd..597d8cd
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb
> > > +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-core/plymouth/plymouth_0.9.2.bb
> > > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
> > > "file://COPYING;md5=94d55d512a9ba36caa9b7df079bae19f">
> > >  DEPENDS = "libcap libpng cairo dbus udev"
> > >  PROVIDES = "virtual/psplash"
> > >
> > > -RPROVIDES_${PN} = "virtual/psplash virtual/psplash-support"
> > > +RPROVIDES_${PN} += "psplash psplash-support"
> >
> > This causes new NOTE in every build:
> > NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime psplash (psplash,
> > plymouth) NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_RPROVIDER entry to match
> > psplash
> >
> > Do you want to update
> > meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
> > to resolve this first?
>
> Is this even the right thing to do? Is plymouth a direct drop-in
> replacement
> for psplash as this implies or (as I suspect) are there subtle differences?
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>