[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fftw: Allow an empty package for fftw.
Philip Balister
philip at balister.org
Fri Oct 21 23:05:44 UTC 2016
On 10/21/2016 01:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
>>
>> The fftw-dev package RDEPENDS on the fftw package. Let the recipe create an
>> empty one to satisfy this requirement.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
>> ---
>> meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>> index 0faaea1..0bb6cc2 100644
>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>> @@ -69,4 +69,6 @@ FILES_fftwl-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwl-wisdom"
>> FILES_fftwf-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwf-wisdom"
>> FILES_fftw-wisdom-to-conf = "${bindir}/fftw-wisdom-to-conf"
>>
>> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}= “1"
>
> as Martin said
>
> RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = “”
>
> should be done.
It also RDEPENDS on libfftw libfftwf and libfftwl.
Is there a way to remove just one entry in the RDEPENDS line? Need to
think through exactly what is going on.
Philip
>
>> +
>> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
>> --
>> 2.5.5
>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
>
>
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list