[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fftw: Allow an empty package for fftw.

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Fri Oct 21 23:29:38 UTC 2016


On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
> On 10/21/2016 01:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> The fftw-dev package RDEPENDS on the fftw package. Let the recipe create an
>>> empty one to satisfy this requirement.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
>>> ---
>>> meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>>> index 0faaea1..0bb6cc2 100644
>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>>> @@ -69,4 +69,6 @@ FILES_fftwl-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwl-wisdom"
>>> FILES_fftwf-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwf-wisdom"
>>> FILES_fftw-wisdom-to-conf = "${bindir}/fftw-wisdom-to-conf"
>>>
>>> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}= “1"
>>
>> as Martin said
>>
>> RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = “”
>>
>> should be done.
>
> It also RDEPENDS on libfftw libfftwf and libfftwl.
>
> Is there a way to remove just one entry in the RDEPENDS line? Need to
> think through exactly what is going on.
>

uncoupling it like this will be take care of that too.



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list