[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fftw: Allow an empty package for fftw.

Martin Jansa martin.jansa at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 15:43:50 UTC 2016


RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev_remove = “${PN}”

doesn't work?

On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
wrote:

> On 10/21/2016 01:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
> >
> >> On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The fftw-dev package RDEPENDS on the fftw package. Let the recipe
> create an
> >> empty one to satisfy this requirement.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
> >> ---
> >> meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb | 2 ++
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
> >> index 0faaea1..0bb6cc2 100644
> >> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
> >> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
> >> @@ -69,4 +69,6 @@ FILES_fftwl-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwl-wisdom"
> >> FILES_fftwf-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwf-wisdom"
> >> FILES_fftw-wisdom-to-conf = "${bindir}/fftw-wisdom-to-conf"
> >>
> >> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}= “1"
> >
> > as Martin said
> >
> > RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = “”
> >
> > should be done.
>
> It also RDEPENDS on libfftw libfftwf and libfftwl.
>
> Is there a way to remove just one entry in the RDEPENDS line? Need to
> think through exactly what is going on.
>
> Philip
>
> >
> >> +
> >> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
> >> --
> >> 2.5.5
> >>
> >> --
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> >> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
> >
> >
> >
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list