[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] fftw: Allow an empty package for fftw.

[Philip Balister]

On 10/24/2016 11:43 AM, Martin Jansa wrote:
> RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev_remove = “${PN}”

I'll give it a whirl, thanks!

Philip

> 
> doesn't work?
> 
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/21/2016 01:08 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 5:14 AM, Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The fftw-dev package RDEPENDS on the fftw package. Let the recipe
>> create an
>>>> empty one to satisfy this requirement.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philip Balister <philip at balister.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb | 2 ++
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>> b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>>>> index 0faaea1..0bb6cc2 100644
>>>> --- a/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>>>> +++ b/meta-oe/recipes-support/fftw/fftw_3.3.4.bb
>>>> @@ -69,4 +69,6 @@ FILES_fftwl-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwl-wisdom"
>>>> FILES_fftwf-wisdom = "${bindir}/fftwf-wisdom"
>>>> FILES_fftw-wisdom-to-conf = "${bindir}/fftw-wisdom-to-conf"
>>>>
>>>> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}= “1"
>>>
>>> as Martin said
>>>
>>> RDEPENDS_${PN}-dev = “”
>>>
>>> should be done.
>>
>> It also RDEPENDS on libfftw libfftwf and libfftwl.
>>
>> Is there a way to remove just one entry in the RDEPENDS line? Need to
>> think through exactly what is going on.
>>
>> Philip
>>
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> BBCLASSEXTEND = "native"
>>>> --
>>>> 2.5.5
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openembedded-devel mailing list
>> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
>> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>>