[oe] chromium detected as stripped

[Khem Raj]

On 8/15/17 6:05 AM, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> Otavio Salvador <otavio.salvador at ossystems.com.br> writes:
> 
>>>> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Jussi Kukkonen
>>>> <jussi.kukkonen at intel.com> wrote:
>>>>> On a related note, this good work is currently a bit hidden in
>>>>> meta-crosswalk -- is there a chance we could get this combined with
>>>>> meta-browser (or whatever place makes sense)? I know next to nothing about
>>>>> chromium packaging so CCing Raphael and the meta-browser maintainers for
>>>>> comments.
>>
>> Indeed it does sound like the proper workaround for now. That said,
>> I'd love to receive more help from meta-crosswalk people and avoid
>> duplication of work in packaging Chromium so I am adding Raphael on Cc
>> here so he can comment about how we can try to work together on this.
> 
> The main reason why we haven't worked together yet is procrastination
> from my side :-)
> 
> My recipe's working fine and is up-to-date with Chromium's stable
> releases, but I'd love to find a more permanent home for it and stop
> duplicating the efforts, especially as I spend most of my time working
> on Chromium itself, not its Yocto recipe or even Yocto in general.
> 
> The main reason why I opted to start my recipe from scratch at the time
> was simplicity: the meta-browser repository used the same recipe for
> Chromium, CEF and Chromium with Ozone-Wayland, offered many different
> options and shipped quite a few patches that made updates quite
> difficult. My recipe is a lot less customizable, but OTOH that makes it
> quite easy to move to new Chromium milestones. If we're able to find a
> balance there, I definitely think we'd be able to get a lot more done
> together.

what are main architectures targetted with crosswalk ? I think scope is
important, since meta-browser supports, almost all oe-core supported
architectures. including x86/arm/mips/ppc, any cross build patches are
required in anycase, but architecture patches will be additional if you
were only considering a subset of architectures.

>