[oe] chromium detected as stripped

Raphael Kubo da Costa raphael.kubo.da.costa at intel.com
Tue Aug 15 16:23:01 UTC 2017


Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> writes:

> what are main architectures targetted with crosswalk ? I think scope is
> important, since meta-browser supports, almost all oe-core supported
> architectures. including x86/arm/mips/ppc, any cross build patches are
> required in anycase, but architecture patches will be additional if you
> were only considering a subset of architectures.

There's nothing Crosswalk-related in my Chromium recipe; it's in
meta-crosswalk simply due to a historical accident and the fact that I
haven't found a proper home for it so far.

With that said, I've tested my builds with x86, x86-64, ARMv7 (IIRC
Chromium doesn't support earlier ARM processors) and aarch64.



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list