[oe] chromium detected as stripped

[Andreas Müller]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 6:23 PM, Raphael Kubo da Costa
<raphael.kubo.da.costa at intel.com> wrote:
> Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> what are main architectures targetted with crosswalk ? I think scope is
>> important, since meta-browser supports, almost all oe-core supported
>> architectures. including x86/arm/mips/ppc, any cross build patches are
>> required in anycase, but architecture patches will be additional if you
>> were only considering a subset of architectures.
>
> There's nothing Crosswalk-related in my Chromium recipe; it's in
> meta-crosswalk simply due to a historical accident and the fact that I
> haven't found a proper home for it so far.
>
> With that said, I've tested my builds with x86, x86-64, ARMv7 (IIRC
> Chromium doesn't support earlier ARM processors) and aarch64.
I think the update stopper for chromium on meta browser is the new
build system (don't remember the name). To take this step and have a
more recent version of chromium in meta-browser would be really great!

Andreas