[oe] is there a reason meta-openembedded/meta contains a lonely libgpiod.bb recipe?

Andrea Galbusera gizero at gmail.com
Fri May 26 06:04:51 UTC 2017


On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Belisko Marek <marek.belisko at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Robert P. J. Day
> <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 May 2017, Belisko Marek wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day <
> rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >   is there some rationale for libgpiod.bb to be the lone recipe
> >> > under meta-openembedded/meta? would that recipe not fit into some
> >> > other layer?
> >
> >> I posted few days ago recipe for libgpiod. Please look at:
> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/
> 2017-May/112810.html
> >
> >   but that doesn't really answer the question as to why that recipe
> > went into meta-openembedded/meta and not meta-openembedded/meta-oe.
> > even the subject refers to "meta-oe", so why was that recipe placed in
> > a directory named "meta"? was that perhaps a typo?
> Yes probably type. First version of patch was placed in meta-oe. My
> bad. I'll fix that but didn't get any feedback on patch yet. Thanks.
>

Your patch was already merged with the 'suspicious' path. I'd suggest
sending a new patch that moves it under meta-oe/.



More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list