[oe] is there a reason meta-openembedded/meta contains a lonely libgpiod.bb recipe?

[Belisko Marek]

On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Andrea Galbusera <gizero at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Belisko Marek <marek.belisko at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:38 PM, Robert P. J. Day
>> <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 25 May 2017, Belisko Marek wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Robert P. J. Day
>> >> <rpjday at crashcourse.ca> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >   is there some rationale for libgpiod.bb to be the lone recipe
>> >> > under meta-openembedded/meta? would that recipe not fit into some
>> >> > other layer?
>> >
>> >> I posted few days ago recipe for libgpiod. Please look at:
>> >>
>> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2017-May/112810.html
>> >
>> >   but that doesn't really answer the question as to why that recipe
>> > went into meta-openembedded/meta and not meta-openembedded/meta-oe.
>> > even the subject refers to "meta-oe", so why was that recipe placed in
>> > a directory named "meta"? was that perhaps a typo?
>> Yes probably type. First version of patch was placed in meta-oe. My
>> bad. I'll fix that but didn't get any feedback on patch yet. Thanks.
>
>
> Your patch was already merged with the 'suspicious' path. I'd suggest
> sending a new patch that moves it under meta-oe/.
Hmm thanks. I wasn't  aware of that that it was already merged. Thanks
I'll post updated version.


BR,

marek


-- 
as simple and primitive as possible
-------------------------------------------------
Marek Belisko - OPEN-NANDRA
Freelance Developer

Ruska Nova Ves 219 | Presov, 08005 Slovak Republic
Tel: +421 915 052 184
skype: marekwhite
twitter: #opennandra
web: http://open-nandra.com