[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libpng12: add it back from oe-core

[Martin Jansa]

If LSB isn't goal of oe-core, then why not move all this:

OE qemux86-64@ ~/build/oe-core/openembedded-core $ find meta -name \*lsb\*
meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb
meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb
meta/recipes-extended/lsb
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/0001-fix-lsb_release-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.72.bb
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_4.1.bb
meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest
meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb
meta/lib/oe/__pycache__/lsb.cpython-35.pyc
meta/lib/oe/__pycache__/lsb.cpython-36.pyc
meta/lib/oe/lsb.pyc
meta/lib/oe/lsb.py

together with libpng12, to some new meta-lsb layer, preferably outside
meta-oe repository as I already have enough of this stuff.

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:

> On 14 September 2017 at 14:49, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin at linux.
> intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On 09/14/2017 04:42 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 September 2017 at 11:33, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> LSB compliance isn't a goal of meta-oe as well, otherwise we'd need to
>>>> add Qt4 to meta-oe too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Touche.
>>>
>>> It still needs to go somewhere though...
>>>
>>
>> How about modifying the LSB tests to make the absence of libpng12 a
>> warning rather than an error?
>>
>
> Then it won't be doing a LSB test...   The LSB is the LSB, we don't claim
> to support it, but there's a need for a libpng12 recipe for people who want
> to be close.  Currently it's just this one recipe that I'm aware of that
> isn't already in a layer somewhere.
>
> Ross
>