[oe] [meta-oe][PATCH] libpng12: add it back from oe-core

[Khem Raj]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 8:58 AM, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> If LSB isn't goal of oe-core, then why not move all this:
>
> OE qemux86-64@ ~/build/oe-core/openembedded-core $ find meta -name \*lsb\*
> meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb
> meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-dev.bb
> meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb-sdk.bb
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_pidofproc
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_start_daemon
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_log_message
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/0001-fix-lsb_release-to-work-with-busybox-head-and-find.patch
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb/lsb_killproc
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts_9.72.bb
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbinitscripts
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest_1.0.bb
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_4.1.bb
> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsbtest
> meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb
> meta/lib/oe/__pycache__/lsb.cpython-35.pyc
> meta/lib/oe/__pycache__/lsb.cpython-36.pyc
> meta/lib/oe/lsb.pyc
> meta/lib/oe/lsb.py
>
> together with libpng12, to some new meta-lsb layer, preferably outside
> meta-oe repository as I already have enough of this stuff.
>

A patch to remove them is good since you already found this out. If
they get into a layer of its own
can happen later when lsb interested devs chime in.

> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Burton, Ross <ross.burton at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14 September 2017 at 14:49, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin at linux.
>> intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/14/2017 04:42 PM, Burton, Ross wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 14 September 2017 at 11:33, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> LSB compliance isn't a goal of meta-oe as well, otherwise we'd need to
>>>>> add Qt4 to meta-oe too.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Touche.
>>>>
>>>> It still needs to go somewhere though...
>>>>
>>>
>>> How about modifying the LSB tests to make the absence of libpng12 a
>>> warning rather than an error?
>>>
>>
>> Then it won't be doing a LSB test...   The LSB is the LSB, we don't claim
>> to support it, but there's a need for a libpng12 recipe for people who want
>> to be close.  Currently it's just this one recipe that I'm aware of that
>> isn't already in a layer somewhere.
>>
>> Ross
>>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel at lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel