[oe] [meta-networking][PATCHv2] samba: Add packagegroup

Andreas Oberritter obi at opendreambox.org
Wed Jan 24 11:44:40 UTC 2018


On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 23:25:11 -0600
Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/23/18 5:58 PM, Andreas Oberritter wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:48:14 -0600
> > Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 8:21 AM, zhengrq <zhengrq.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:  
> >>> Add packagegroup for samba, for there are too many rpms in samba and it's hard to manage.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zheng Ruoqin <zhengrq.fnst at cn.fujitsu.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  .../recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.6.7.bb         | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.6.7.bb b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.6.7.bb
> >>> index 2b227c9..0bacb02 100644
> >>> --- a/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.6.7.bb
> >>> +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-connectivity/samba/samba_4.6.7.bb
> >>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ PACKAGES =+ "${PN}-python ${PN}-pidl \
> >>>               ${PN}-dsdb-modules ${PN}-testsuite registry-tools \
> >>>               winbind \
> >>>               ${PN}-common ${PN}-base ${PN}-ctdb-tests \
> >>> -             smbclient"
> >>> +             smbclient ${PN}-client ${PN}-test"
> >>>
> >>>  python samba_populate_packages() {
> >>>      def module_hook(file, pkg, pattern, format, basename):
> >>> @@ -254,3 +254,20 @@ FILES_smbclient = "${bindir}/cifsdd \
> >>>
> >>>  RDEPENDS_${PN}-pidl_append = " perl"
> >>>  FILES_${PN}-pidl = "${bindir}/pidl ${datadir}/perl5/Parse"
> >>> +
> >>> +SUMMARY_${PN}-client = "samba client"
> >>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-client = "\
> >>> +    smbclient \
> >>> +    winbind \
> >>> +    registry-tools \
> >>> +    ${PN}-pidl \
> >>> +    "
> >>> +
> >>> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-client = "1"
> >>> +
> >>> +RDEPENDS_${PN}-test = "\
> >>> +    ${PN}-ctdb-tests \
> >>> +    ${PN}-testsuite \
> >>> +    "
> >>> +
> >>> +ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-test = "1"    
> >>
> >> perhaps better to add a packagegroup recipe explicitly  
> > 
> > How would a packagegroup be useful for a single recipe? We discussed this
> > back in December:  
> 
> why does single recipe matter ?

Because the most simple form of a group of packages is a meta package in the
recipe creating the packages. And simple, in case of doubt, wins against
complicated.

Regards,
Andreas

> 
> > 
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2017-December/115888.html
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Andreas
> >   
> 




More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list