[oe] [Openembedded-architecture] Dropping armv5 and armv5e tunes in 2.7

[Khem Raj]

Thanks Adrian

On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 2:59 PM Adrian Bunk <bunk at stusta.de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 02:01:42PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
> > Hello All
> >
> > You might have noticed a recent commit in gcc trunk
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=b232e6b58e3766bc66fe08fdb7bcba1bdadda8a2
> >
> > Which removed support for deprecated -march=armv5 and armv5e, this
> > will be released along with gcc-9 release which is upcoming and we
> > might be able to add gcc9 to 2.7 release or 2.8 release for sure.
> >
> > We still have non-thumb tunes for armv5 and armv4 in our tune pack, I
> > would like to propose a patch to remove them.
> >...
>
> Note that gcc 9 does *not* remove non-thumb armv4 support.
>

yes that's right. However, I was taking this time to find out if we can drop all
the ones besides armv5te even if gcc supported it unless there were OE users
who are still interested in supporting them and had devices running OE
which need them

> Non-thumb armv5/armv5e have been removed due to
> "have no known implementations".
>
> Non-thumb armv4 support was deprecated in gcc 6 together with armv2/armv3,
> but there are still people using recent gcc on StrongARM - which is
> non-thumb armv4.

OK, that's a fair point, however, in OE's case I only have reports from users
with armv4t devices, but it we can keep the armv4 arm-only tunes around along
with the arm-thumb v4 ones

>
> > Thanks
> > -Khem
>
> cu
> Adrian
>
> --
>
>        "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
>         of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
>        "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
>                                        Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
>