[oe] [PATCH 1/9] poppler: upgrade 0.82.0 -> 0.84.0

[Randy MacLeod]

On 1/13/20 3:34 PM, Randy MacLeod wrote:
> On 1/13/20 3:20 PM, Mingde (Matthew) Zeng wrote:
>>>> Have you by chance tried to add ptest coverage for poppler?
>>>> If not, Matthew may do that.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Have not done any ptest on this - just some runtime tests on target 
>>> with evince
>>>
>>> Andreas
>> ```
>> $ make test
>> Running tests...
>> Test project /home/mzeng/code/poppler/build
>>        Start  1: check_qt5_attachments
>>   1/21 Test  #1: check_qt5_attachments ............***Failed    2.47 sec
>>        Start  2: check_qt5_dateConversion
>>   2/21 Test  #2: check_qt5_dateConversion .........   Passed    0.58 sec
>> ...
>> ```
>>
>> Poppler's `make test` runs tests from the `/build/qt5/tests` 
>> directory, which apparently are relying on qt5.
>>
>> ```
>> /**************************************************************************** 
>>
>> ** Meta object code from reading C++ file 'check_attachments.cpp'
>> **
>> ** Created by: The Qt Meta Object Compiler version 67 (Qt 5.14.0)
>> **
>> ** WARNING! All changes made in this file will be lost!
>> *****************************************************************************/ 
>>
>>
>> #include <memory>
>> #include <QtCore/qbytearray.h>
>> #include <QtCore/qmetatype.h>
>> ...
>> ```
>>
>> Is it worth it to write a ptest and sort out the meta-qt5 layer?
> 
> No, we can't have meta-openembedded packages depend
> on meta-qt5 content.
> 
> The meta-oe layer only depends on oe-core (aka core):
> 
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/conf/layer.conf#n30 

Of course you could add the ptest code in a .bbappend in
the meta-qt5 layer but I won't ask you to do that.

Take a look at the bbappends in meta-qt5 if you are curious:
https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-qt5/#appends

../Randy
> 
> 
> Thanks for looking into it Matthew,
> 
> ../Randy
> 
>>
>>      Matthew
> 
> 


-- 
# Randy MacLeod
# Wind River Linux