[OE-core] [yocto] OpenEmbedded and musl-libc

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Dear Khem Raj,
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:22:24 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
>
>> it has been under my radar for a while. I have actually locally made
>> toolchains with
>> clang+musl and it seems to be coming along. its licensed differently thats
>> the biggest attraction for folks who do static linking. Otherwise it still
>> doesnt yet support variety of architectures that other libcs support. given
>> now we have kconfig for eglibc too may be it fills in the nommu gap much
>> like uclibc does today.
>
> The non-MMU gap? Last time I looked, musl didn't had support for any
> non-MMU architecture.

yes it does not. I meant to state the reverse that mmu-less systems is
where uclibc will have edge left.