[oe] RFC: Renaming uboot-utils
Paul Sokolovsky
pmiscml at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 11:13:08 UTC 2007
Hello Koen,
Friday, December 14, 2007, 10:16:22 PM, you wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> Andy Wilcox schreef:
>> Since uboot-utils builds a native binary (mkImage) it should really be
>> called
>> uboot-utils-native.
> That part makes sense. FWIW, we already have a uboot-mkimage-native
> recipe in OE.
>> My motivation is (a) I'd really like to build a few tools from uboot
>> which are cross-compiled
> And now you're talking about uboot-utils-cross, not uboot-utils-native
I had a look at mkimage source, it appears to generate
target-independent format (does htonl() and friends), so it at least
can stay uboot-utils-native as the actual commit made it.
More interestingly is that both u-boot and u-boot-utils-native stage
mkimage, and that's all what u-boot-utils-native does actually, so we
have redundancy here.
> regards,
> Koen
[]
--
Best regards,
Paul mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com
More information about the Openembedded-devel
mailing list