[oe] RFC: Renaming uboot-utils

Paul Sokolovsky pmiscml at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 11:13:08 UTC 2007


Hello Koen,

Friday, December 14, 2007, 10:16:22 PM, you wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

> Andy Wilcox schreef:
>> Since uboot-utils builds a native binary (mkImage) it should really be 
>> called
>> uboot-utils-native.

> That part makes sense. FWIW, we already have a uboot-mkimage-native
> recipe in OE.

>> My motivation is (a) I'd really like to build a few tools from uboot
>> which are cross-compiled

> And now you're talking about uboot-utils-cross, not uboot-utils-native

  I had a look at mkimage source, it appears to generate
target-independent format (does htonl() and friends), so it at least
can stay uboot-utils-native as the actual commit made it.

  More interestingly is that both u-boot and u-boot-utils-native stage
mkimage, and that's all what u-boot-utils-native does actually, so we
have redundancy here.

> regards,

> Koen

[]


-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                            mailto:pmiscml at gmail.com





More information about the Openembedded-devel mailing list