[oe] RFC: diet-x11, small-x11 and fat-x11

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

pHilipp Zabel schreef:
> On 2/6/07, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.kabel.utwente.nl> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Koen Kooi schreef:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose to split diet-x11 and libx11 into the following:
>>>
>>> diet-x11: as small as possible, without stuff like cms and xkb
>>> small-x11: small, but with cms and xkb, usefull for highend palmtops and small settop-boxes
>>> fat-x11: biggest version, usefull for big-bad-workstation images.
>>>
>>> what do you think about it?
>> Nobody is thinking something?
> 
> I was thinking I don't like the diet/small/fat naming, you are mixing metaphors.
> small/medium/big I'd understand,
> or diet/light/supersize or
> slender/chubby/fat...
> I thought I'd better keep that to myself :) Oh well...
> 
> One thing I'd like to see would be a different package name for all
> three of them, so we can actually have all versions in the feeds
> (currently both libx11 and diet-x11 build packages with the same
> name).

However annoying, it is a feature which we can exploit. If we take care that PR_small-x11
< PR_medium-x11 < PR_big-x11 we can split those into different feeds containing libx11 +
dependant apps.

regards,

Koen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFyF95MkyGM64RGpERAvJcAJ9TrmkHuPzCtL24vDhLqCYjKk4qgQCgg5+d
oxkgTyx+D10nfJ3KzZ5pPO8=
=U8Za
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----