[oe] {RFC] console-image.bb

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 30-01-10 11:35, Frans Meulenbroeks wrote:
> Today I bumped into console-image and noticed the following:
> 
> IMAGE_INSTALL = "task-base \
>             ${ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL} \
>             ${SPLASH} \
>             ${ZZAPSPLASH} \
> 
> Wouldn't it be cleaner to rename ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL to e.g.
> DISTRO_EXTRA_INSTALL ?
> This under the assumption that console-image is a distro independent recipe.
> 
> Or, in case this is an angstrom specific recipe shouldn't it be better
> named angstrom-console-image ?
> 
> your views are appreciated :-)

I vote for leaving it as it is, it gives some credit to where it
originated from. The image name already has been forcefully renamed to
strip out 'angstrom' so lets keep at least this bit of heritage.
Besides, who's going to fix all users of ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL?

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFLZE7ZMkyGM64RGpERAjNMAJ4i4uyZeQFuJ+HDtqa8dbMXXxsWWQCfY0p8
3IiVq82EW/8VVA3bWWjraxg=
=R852
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----