[oe] Question about OVERRIDES precedence

[Chris Larson]

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Maupin, Chase <chase.maupin at ti.com> wrote:

> So are you saying that we are just going to change the order of how
> OVERRIDES is appended to in OE like Denys was suggesting?  That would still
> lead to issues like local not being the highest priority unless we would
> also change bitbake.conf to define OVERRIDES as
> "${TARGET_ARCH}:${TARGET_OS}:${MACHINE}:local".  That way we could prepend
> OVERRIDES in OE and still have local be the last one evaluated.
>

No.  What I'm saying is, the definition of OVERRIDES in bitbake.conf will be
reversed.  Not that difficult to understand.  I don't know how I could
possibly be any clearer here.
-- 
Christopher Larson
clarson at kergoth dot com
Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus
Maintainer - Tslib
Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics