[oe] Missing GLIBC_<version> tags on binaries

[Phil Blundell]

On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 20:14 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> It fails at runtime. The application I am compiling is freerdp and
> sem_ symbols are not versioned, dunno why.

Do you mean that the symbols aren't versioned at all, or that they are
versioned but your libc.so.6 doesn't provide the versions that the
binary is expecting?  If the latter, what versions does it have?

Is the libc in your sysroot the same binary (ie same md5sum) that you're
using at runtime?

p.